Public Forum Proceed to Auspet's New Discussion Forum | Pet Directory | Classifieds | Home | LinkXchange


Click here to make Auspet.com your default home page

  Auspet - Message Boards
  - Dogs - Pit bulls
  Confirmation

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Confirmation
cricket
Member

Posts: 51
From:Los Angeles, CA. U.S.A.
Registered: Dec 2003

posted 12-30-2003 11:23 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for cricket     Edit/Delete Message
Why is it that a big head, big boned pitbull is considered to be poorly bred?

IP: Logged

benny boy
Member

Posts: 392
From:lewisville, texas, united states
Registered: Oct 2003

posted 12-30-2003 11:29 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for benny boy     Edit/Delete Message
because traditionally they were not bred for those charactaristics as they wouldn't serve any real purpose fighting in the pit. look at some older pictures of pits and they won't have huge heads, and won't be overly thick.
http://www.colbypitbull.com/

IP: Logged

cricket
Member

Posts: 51
From:Los Angeles, CA. U.S.A.
Registered: Dec 2003

posted 12-30-2003 11:39 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for cricket     Edit/Delete Message
But i dont feel that makes them poorly bred, they are just as, if not more selectively chosen for breeding, as any game dog.

IP: Logged

Freedom
Member

Posts: 62
From:W-S, NC, USA
Registered: Feb 2003

posted 12-30-2003 01:12 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Freedom     Edit/Delete Message
THey are poorly bred because this what they are MAINLY bred for. People who just breed for massive head and chest most of the time do NOT pay attention to health, temperament, or all in all conformation. The APBT is a medium sized dog and it should be proportionate.

IP: Logged

cricket
Member

Posts: 51
From:Los Angeles, CA. U.S.A.
Registered: Dec 2003

posted 12-30-2003 01:35 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for cricket     Edit/Delete Message
But these dogs are just as game and many of them come from very reputable game bloodlines, and it is only through selective breeding that these dogs can consitently be of a larger size. So it is in-accurate for you to say that they are bred regardless of health and temperment. These dogs are still of medium size and are very proportionate. And all in all, regardless of there size, they are still pure bred pitbulls. These game dog enthusiast almost seem to dis-own them from the breed

IP: Logged

Freedom
Member

Posts: 62
From:W-S, NC, USA
Registered: Feb 2003

posted 12-30-2003 01:54 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Freedom     Edit/Delete Message
How can a dog be proportionate if he has a big head and chest? Sure you can consistently breed for big head and chest but that doesn't mean you are consistently breeding for health and temperament. How many reputable kennels do you know that only breed for size or color? I'm sure slim to none.

IP: Logged

chickee
Member

Posts: 150
From:Western Pennsylvania, USA
Registered: Dec 2003

posted 12-30-2003 03:08 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for chickee     Edit/Delete Message
Most of my dogs have bigger heads and chests than the gamedogs. It does not EVEN mean they are badly bred. What a blanket statement that is. I like the more bullier look rather than the terrier look, and thank god we have the choice with such a diverse breed. Not all dogs of old were small dogs, so we should get that straight right now! With that aside, maybe this person was talking about these truly massive 27" head dogs. 17 - 18" tall, 95lb wonders. Can you just imagine the health problems to arrise just from that alone, not to mention a shorter life span. In my opinion, and we all have one, if someone feels the need to breed for such overdone characteristics without concern for it's overall health, what makes you think they are well-bred?
Unfortunately, alot of the new sites out here are not being bred right period. But who am I.....just someone else with an opinion I guess.

------------------
REDCOAT KENNELS
Home of the chocolate/rednose!

IP: Logged

benny boy
Member

Posts: 392
From:lewisville, texas, united states
Registered: Oct 2003

posted 12-30-2003 03:32 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for benny boy     Edit/Delete Message
i think that freedom was just trying to say that a 65 lb. dog with a 25" head and a huge chest isn't proportionate. we can argue about what is and what isn't proportionate all day, but when it comes down to it, i guess it's just someones personal prefrence. and also i have seen plenty of sites and breeders that soley breed huge heads, and extremely wide chests without even testing the dogs that they're breeding for hd, etc...
quote:
How many reputable kennels do you know that only breed for size or color? I'm sure slim to none.

i can agree with that if thats all the thought that is put into a breeding.

IP: Logged

True_Pits
Member

Posts: 373
From:TX, USA
Registered: Oct 2003

posted 12-30-2003 03:53 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for True_Pits     Edit/Delete Message
"But these dogs are just as game and many of them come from very reputable game bloodlines"

WHAT!? How do you know these dogs are just as game if they are only being bred on how they look? Please explain that to me. What makes you so sure they are game? Coming from a game bloodline doesn't make the dog game at all. A dog being out of 2 CH parents doesn't mean that dog isn't a cur. And many dogs are not bred how the papers say, so you don't even know if it is true. There are a lot of people recently whom I talked with that have hung papers. But the club won't do a thing about it because the dogs bring them money. They are MIXED with other breds with FAKE papers saying they are bred so well.

IP: Logged

cricket
Member

Posts: 51
From:Los Angeles, CA. U.S.A.
Registered: Dec 2003

posted 12-31-2003 09:43 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for cricket     Edit/Delete Message
Ok, well how is a game dog so well bred when it is mainly bred for gameness, usually regardless of confirmation. i've seen some so called game pits that more closely ressemble dingo's than a pit. What im saying is, every breeder breeds for certain traits or charachteristics, what makes a game breeders program better than a breeder who prefers larger size? And I know these dogs are game simply because of the fact that gameness is also one of the charachteristics that they are bred for. Our goal is to breed a more powerful, more beautiful dog, with all of the same game qualities as the original pits.

IP: Logged

Freedom
Member

Posts: 62
From:W-S, NC, USA
Registered: Feb 2003

posted 12-31-2003 10:08 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Freedom     Edit/Delete Message
"Ok, well how is a game dog so well bred when it is mainly bred for gameness, usually regardless of confirmation. i've seen some so called game pits that more closely ressemble dingo's than a pit."

Because is what makes the APBT what it is. Kennels that breed specifically for this trait, breed working dogs for the []. They don't care about conformation really, all they care about is it has the ability, endurance, and gameness. Majority of these dogs on their yards will be somewhat rangier and not have the blocky big head appearance because they are NOT bred for that. A gamebred dog coming straight from a dogman's yard is probably the most temperamentally sound dog you will ever find.

"What im saying is, every breeder breeds for certain traits or charachteristics, what makes a game breeders program better than a breeder who prefers larger size?"

Because someone who just breeds for size usually isn't doing it right. If someone is just breeding for massive head and chest, then thats all they are gonna look for. They aren't gonna do the proper health tests or temperament tests. Most of the time these breeders that are breeding for massive size are blue breeders and breeding blue to blue, which is a major NO NO. OR they are mixing in another breed such as bullmastiff, to get that larger head and chest look. The so called "low riders" out there, that have huge heads and chests, but are extremely short. Do you think they are doing HD tests? Probably not.

"And I know these dogs are game simply because of the fact that gameness is also one of the charachteristics that they are bred for. Our goal is to breed a more powerful, more beautiful dog, with all of the same game qualities as the original pits."

Just so you know, just because a dog is bred for gameness does NOT mean the dog is going to be game. Do you know how to test a dog to see if he is game or not? It's not just breeding, if only it were that simple, lol. Also, I highly doubt that your larger more powerful dog can do what a 35 lb. highly conditioned apbt can do. When you just breed for looks you lose a whole lot more down the road.

IP: Logged

True_Pits
Member

Posts: 373
From:TX, USA
Registered: Oct 2003

posted 12-31-2003 11:26 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for True_Pits     Edit/Delete Message
Well said Freedom. Those big stocky, wide chested Pit Bulls aren't even half as athletic as a smaller, well conformed dog. let alone a game dog. They surely aren't game at all. A walk around the block is hard for some. Especially on a hot day. Stocky dogs are sometimes shallow chested, which would make them short winded taking away from their ability, not just in a game test but their ability to do any strenous athletic activity. Some dogs have bowed legs or their legs are extremely far apart. They are heavy with short legs supporting the heavy body that is not healthy and is bad for their joints.

And it is CONFORMATION, not confirmation those two words mean two different things.

IP: Logged

cricket
Member

Posts: 51
From:Los Angeles, CA. U.S.A.
Registered: Dec 2003

posted 12-31-2003 03:39 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for cricket     Edit/Delete Message
Maybe Im seeming a bit one sided. I have had pit's that have ranged from as small as 30lbs, to as big as 80 lbs, so i am speaking from experience. YES, i do know how to game test a dog, and from what I see the results are relatively the same. There are just as many game bred dogs that turned out to be currs as the larger bred dogs. True enough, some do seem to be "slightly" shorter winded, but as with every rule, there are exceptions. And if these exceptions are bred together, eventually (in my opinion) an unstoppable pit will be developed.(Which some breeders have already accomplished) and honestly, some of my smaller dogs were easily out winded by some of the bigger one's. So really, it depends on the individual dog. Saying that these dogs are not athletes is like saying a 300lb football player is not an athlete. As for these deformed bowed legged dogs , and mastiff mixes, thats not at all what im talking about. I notice that you guys keep using the frase "True Pits" it seems to me like you fail to realize that these are the same breed of dog that all of the dog men have on there yard, just on a larger scale. They have the same determination or "gameness" as any other pit, because it's in ther genes, There "pitbulls" for crying out loud.

IP: Logged

True_Pits
Member

Posts: 373
From:TX, USA
Registered: Oct 2003

posted 12-31-2003 04:35 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for True_Pits     Edit/Delete Message
"There are just as many game bred dogs that turned out to be currs as the larger bred dogs."

That NOT true at all. I guess it would be HARD to prove either way since their isn't like documented evidence of illegal activies just laying around. BUT I do know some idiots who try to breed large dogs with gameness and test them. If they are small enough to put on a gamebred dog they are stopped. Some jump the Pit screaming and running AWAY. They are NOT a game dog and quit in a hard test. I'm NOT saying all as size isn't what makes a dog game. I'm not saying a small dog is gamer than a dog that is bigger. But the way the dog is bred is really different. What you just said makes no sense only because by not breeding game dogs you loose gameness. Look at the AmStaff they are not nearly as game as even curr bred Pit Bulls. AmStaffs are not used for fighting any more unless its by a real hairbrained idiot. I read a story that was about a very game dog, and about his life. His onwer was approached by someone with a part AmStaff to test the dog he said was hot and great and blah blah. Finally after convincing and another owner telling the guy the Staff dog was really a game dog and had been rolled such and such a times he put them together. The dog was ghetto rolled, in street fights and it didn't quit then. But it showed it was truly a rank curr once being placed with the game dog. The same goes for the dogs bred solely for their size. The people DON'T game test their dogs. Ones who do end of dissapointed or purposely "test" against their own stock and other dogs like that. They usually don't even look at the dog longer than 10 minutes. Even if the dog quits and is a curr they still breed it. Its true. I know of a man, didn't know him personally though. But he had larger dogs, these were actually good looking dogs though with decent conformation. But he would roll some of his for like 10 minutes then think they are good enough to breed. These dogs were 50-60lbs. He rolled male for 15 minutes once and it quit but he just kept on breeding it. Then maybe two of his offspring turned out to be game. If you even want to call it that. They were never placed with anything serious even though other people owned them they still never gave the dogs a hard test. Really think about what you are saying. What you said would mean that showbred, pullbred, pet bred, BYB bred and gamebred dogs are all equal in gameness. Even some of the show bred dogs that have come from game stock but then used for showing for a couple generations yields a good majority of currs. If you pick out the good ones from those lines, bred them then culled you could get back to breeding truly, good game dogs again. I think that is the problem the other breeders don't cull the quiters, the dog is pretty so the breed it, or the dog pulls well so they breed it. You can SEE the difference in the other breeders who full around with testing their stock but are not into it. Let alone ones bred just for size, color, looks, they are all going to be the same. Some people clain to breed game blue dogs. If the dogs have always quit just as long as they have been rolled they still say they are game dogs and breed them.

Yes there is exceptions both ways. And some dogs are short winded including gamebred small dogs. Thats why I believe CONFORMATION iS IMPORTANT. Some breeders breed ONLY for gameness despite a major, unhealthy fault. To me they are just as wrong as someone who breeds, overly large, badly conformed dogs just because they are blue. Breeding game dogs does mean that gameness is the purpose for breeding, but when the set up and conformation of the dog is unhealthy and takes away from the dog the breeder should still know the dog must be culled no matter how game it shows to be. There was a site with a dog called Hall's Damage, his legs were bowed, his feet were pointed out and like flippers. He was a mess, horrible looking and those things cause him problems and will def. cause major problems when he is older. The owners still want to breed him, still have even though he is like that. Just because he is game, they won't cull him like they should. It doesn't surprise me the dog is one of Halls. From what I've seen Halls dogs have major problems and he seems to only be peddling pups off a name he made a long time ago with some good dogs he had from dogs he aquired else where. Now he just breeds and sells pups. Poorly bred pups, despite the fact they are not huge and are "gamebred" not sure if he does still really test his stock. They are usually bow legged, shallow chested, long and even top heavy. The dogs must also have knee and joints problems among all those other problems. If someone is breeding show dogs for looks, I have NO PROBLEM with that. Its when they breed dogs with problems, just because they are large, have a certain nose or coat color, even though they have BAD conformation with HD or bowed leggs. Or temperment problems.

True to the exceptions but a shallow chest dog is GOING to be short winded. Lots of people breeding bigger dogs bred dogs with shallow chest and keep breeding them togther, so all those dogs will be shortwinded.

"Saying that these dogs are not athletes is like saying a 300lb football player is not an athlete."

This is a little different than with dogs. A smaller individual in most cases makes a better athelete than a larger individual. And again it goes back to conformation. How is the person put together. Some people who are 300lbs can barely walk up the stairs and look overweight. Others do make pretty good athelets and also are TALLER and have a LARGER bone structures. As some dogs do have, but sometimes the weight is too much for their knees and hips if they are just bred for large size with regards to confo and health. I have seen some larger agile dogs. Bullyson was 60lbs CW a big dog.

And also people play sports becuase they want to and train hard. They train hard and enjoy what they do and yes many do have natural talent for it. But dogs are specifically bred for it, they don't get to choose what they want to do or what they would enjoy. If they don't they are culled. Size had nothing to do with gameness its true. A football player also isn't game like the dogs were are talking about even if they are athletic. The people breeding dogs for size don't tend to care too much about the gameness of the dog, even if it were to be aggressive or could still be athletic.

"you fail to realize that these are the same breed of dog that all of the dog men have on there yard, just on a larger scale. They have the same determination or "gameness" as any other pit, because it's in ther genes, There "pitbulls" for crying out loud."

I don't want to repeat myself all over again and make an even longer post, but just because the dog is the breed-American Pit Bull Terrier doesn't mean it is going to be game. That is a bizzare statement to me. Otherwise we could just take all the AmStaffs and they would be just as game. NOT, becaue they are not bred for it. They may be the same breed but NOT the same temperment, and breedings. Like their are working shepherds and strickly show shepherds who people try to work and they only disgrace them. Working Rottweilers doing protection that the show Rotties wouldn't be able to take, and then that the larger bred Rotts bred for size wouldn't have the correct temperment to preform. All the same breed, but NOT the same. They are different in their abilities from one another. Goldens that retrieve ducks with very little training, others scared to death of water since day one and don't know what to do with a duck. Guess its not the size that is the thing, its the breeding. But they are breeding large dogs, not game dogs. Like if they were breeding pull dogs. I've seen quitter become aces.

And all larger dogs are prone to health problems. Even breeds that are naturally larger in size. Like the AmBulldogs, Bullmastiff, English Mastiff, even the Great Dane which isn't as "heavy" as a breed.

[This message has been edited by True_Pits (edited 12-31-2003).]

IP: Logged

chickee
Member

Posts: 150
From:Western Pennsylvania, USA
Registered: Dec 2003

posted 12-31-2003 05:18 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for chickee     Edit/Delete Message
If you ask me, (lol)... i think most of the gamebred dogs you see on the Internet and anywhere else are NOT tested anyway. Just for the fact they are ADBA registered is enough for a LOT of these morons to yell the words "GAME". Also, I think most UKC people would rather have a nice looking (conformationally correct) dog rather than some hot mama trying to kill anything that moves, including myself as one of those UKC people. I don't give a hoot about gameness and I'm not afraid to admit it! By the way, there is a difference between gameness and dog aggression that some of these new people can't seem to understand. My dogs are all dog aggressive, but they definitely are NOT game. LOL...

On another note, talking about Bobby Hall. OMG, I can't believe he sells crap like that and he's a well-known breeder of gamebred dogs. That 'flipper' dog you are referring to is not the 1st one to come out of his line. Poor thing. The guy more or less said he felt sorry for the dog, but he is so game, he has decided NOT to waste it and will be breeding him. (oh boy)...You should post a picture of it so people can see. I think they had it on the lar-san board just recently if you want to pick it up.. lol..

------------------
REDCOAT KENNELS
Home of the chocolate/rednose!

IP: Logged

cricket
Member

Posts: 51
From:Los Angeles, CA. U.S.A.
Registered: Dec 2003

posted 12-31-2003 05:41 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for cricket     Edit/Delete Message
You made a lot of good points in that post. See, I have had apbt's my whole life, And I fully understand what a game dog is. And I know a dog is considered to be game by it's spirit, not it's looks. Right? Personally, I preffer the larger dogs, and true enough there are a lot of bad breeders out there. And as you said it goes both ways.I also believe that breeding just for color is bad because these colors are so rare that the breeders are often breeding closely related dogs, which can cause serious genetic problems if done too often. But as for the size, you have a much larger stock to choose from. Why does it seem so impossible to breed a large game dog? No i am not a fan of the apbt's that look like over sized english bulldogs, but as i said, i do preffer size. And anybody that really knows about pit's know that they do need a little leg length in order for them to serve there original purpose. Those extremely short legged dogs are useless, i think that is the impression that you all are getting that i am talking about when i say larger dogs. I'll see if i can attach a pic.

IP: Logged

True_Pits
Member

Posts: 373
From:TX, USA
Registered: Oct 2003

posted 12-31-2003 09:41 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for True_Pits     Edit/Delete Message
When you say bigger how big do you mean? 60lbs is a BIG Pit Bulls. I know what your talking about with the short legged low riders those are some of the worse. I have seen very NICE looking big dogs, but yes those came down from game lines or at least good lines. Looks at Meka's Deisel dog. She has the link to the pic somewhere. That dog looks awesome and conformed for being such a large dog. But then again he IS from game lines, and at least from two dogs that were probably decent dogs themselves. I never said it was IMPOSSIBLE just very unlikely. Considering I've never seen any doggers with large dogs and even if someone wanted to make their game stock bigger by selectivly breeding they would have little they could test their dogs with. Under 30 and over 50 thier is very little dogs to match into or even test with. I know someone who is having a terribly tough time finding a 56lbs to test with. There just are not game dogs that big. If some bred game dogs and gets a dog of that size, they can't test and prove that dog since its so hard to find another one. If they still bred that dog to female on the larger size they have just bred 2 unproven dogs that may have been currs. The pups come out some too big to test, but they want size to they breed them and keep breeding without testing until they are just breeding currs. Some people are fortunate enough to find a larger dog and their 55lbs dog may be proven game against another game dog that turned out larger. But you see where the problems come in. If someone is focused on size they are not going to worry about breeding for gameness. Dogs usually are not chosen for size, its just they were always a small to medium breed. The dogman are breeding and preserving the breed in their original form there for they are not going to try to enhance size or even breed smaller just because they may like a smaller dog. If they have a 30lbs dog and a 40lbs dog and both are game and good breeding compadibility then the dogs will be bred. Also think about handling a larger dog. Try to imagine making a handle on a 60 or 65lbs dog. You can't even pick a dog of that size up or make a quit handle if needed. Think about all that power infront and under you. A big dog to be standing over before releasing and having to pick up again and take out of the Pit. And your right a more lankier dog is needed. But lots of dogs are tall and only weight in at 40lbs or so. I have one who looks bigger and is taller than my others but she only weight about 44lbs CW.

[This message has been edited by True_Pits (edited 12-31-2003).]

IP: Logged

Meka
Member

Posts: 114
From:Smyrna ,Tn, USA
Registered: Oct 2003

posted 01-01-2004 11:32 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Meka     Edit/Delete Message
Thanks TruePits..... The link is www.picturetrail.com/mekaspits
Diesel is extremely big for a Pit. So were his parents.... He has a fairly large head & chest, but because of his weight & height, he doesn't look disproportionate. As far as getting winded, I can walk him at a slow pace for 2 or 3 hours & he never gets tired... If he's running alot though,(especially if it's hot), he gets winded after about 45 minutes to an hour..... I guess that part just depends on the dog itself.....

IP: Logged

ignergehl
Member

Posts: 174
From:arlington,TX u.s.a.
Registered: Oct 2003

posted 01-04-2004 12:52 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for ignergehl     Edit/Delete Message
[/quote]There are just as many game bred dogs that turned out to be curs as the larger bred dogs.[quote]
Thank you, I,ve been saying this all along, and describing a bloodline of (truly) gamedogs from oklahoma that I had the pleasure of handling that were often 65-85 pounds, athletic and able to compete almost at the level of the smaller dogs.
Who cares if they could only go 35 minutes instead of 50?
On another site commited to only this subject, I have been reviled as a liar for even bringing it up, the purists saying that such dogs could never have competed, or even existed. Yet again, a case of 'they weren't there, but they know all, anyway'.
These large dogs I'm describing weren't big-headed or massive boned, per-se, they were proportionate, and with the game mentality, they weren't about to lay down and give up even if they WERE tired, which they werent. Its not like the dogs weighed 200 pounds or anything!
Also, the size of these dogs was mostly a coincidence, evolution. These dogs had Hank and Centipede in their bloodlines, and were just coming out large, and game.

IP: Logged

True_Pits
Member

Posts: 373
From:TX, USA
Registered: Oct 2003

posted 01-05-2004 12:39 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for True_Pits     Edit/Delete Message
ignergehl Your not seeing the big pic on this one. The dogs your talking about ARE/WERE gamebred. Not big dogs, supposedly being just as game as the rest. MOST of the dogs being match and being bred in general are average to even smaller dogs. Then when you look at the majority of bigger dogs, the gamebreds are game and atheletic. But we all know the majority of large dogs are NOT gamebred and bred more for size, color, pulling ability, looks, UKC conformation I have seen some large ones like 70lbs they are not gamebred just big show dogs. They have no will to fight. I never said there wasn't any large gamebred dogs, but the majority are not game or even game bred. And sadly most are just BYB and comming from breeders with poor breeding practices willing to sascrifice health, temperment and conformation all for size and/or color. With the exception of reputable show breeders.

IP: Logged

All times are ET (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Auspet.com


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.45c
















© 1999-2017 AusPet.com