|
Public Forum | Proceed to Auspet's New Discussion Forum | Pet Directory | Classifieds | Home | LinkXchange |
Click here to make Auspet.com your default home page |
Auspet - Message Boards
- Dogs - Pit bulls All in the color
|
UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
Author | Topic: All in the color |
True_Pits Member Posts: 373 |
posted 12-17-2003 02:58 PM
Here is a breeding that illustrates what I was trying to say on the other thread. Breeding a dominant colored dog to a recessived colored dog doesn't mean more will come out with the dominant color. I have a red nose male out of a black and white, black nose male (heterozyous dominant) bred to a red and white red nose female who is of course homozygous recessive. The male carries the red gene recessivly and USUALLY, but not ALWAYS, throughs red noses. Out of a this litter: 6 pups were red nose and 4 pups had black noses (heterozygous dominant also). So there were less pups with the of the DOMINANT (stonger) trait. Then when bred to a black ELI female had NO red noses. Some blacks and some brindles. Brindle is a recessive trait however. This male bred to another female who was ELI and black had 2 red noses and 4 black noses. There is a pattern or a basis on which he throughs if you can figure it out. I think it was on the "offspring size" thread in which I mentioned I am breeding my female to a 50lbs CW male and I expect larger dogs from this in the 45-50lbs range. This is the male I've been discussing on this thread also. To go into some detail she is a red and white dog with a black nose. As for what Angie said before about a red nose being bred to a black nose and having more black noses this is also true. I wasn't disagreeing completly just stating that it isn't always true. You still have to look at the genetics of the parents. You can't simply say black nose is dominant so more pups will have the black nose. I have a brindle female out of a red nose sire and a brindle female. In this litter only 1 dog was red nose, the other 8 were black noses. 1 was brindle & 1 red. The remaining 6 were seal.
IP: Logged |
goob Member Posts: 552 |
posted 12-17-2003 10:21 PM
quote: Don't forget though that most "white" APBTs are actually not actually white in color, but have such extensive white markings that you can't see their actual color. Those whites he's thrown could be reds, whatever, but due to all the white markings, you can't see their true color.
quote: I'm pretty sure that the red colored red nosed dogs and red colored black nosed dogs' coat colors are caused by two different genes, which might be why he only throws red red nosed dogs? IP: Logged |
True_Pits Member Posts: 373 |
posted 12-18-2003 08:58 AM
I was thinking about the white dogs. I have heard that they are actually dogs of another color in some cases. The pure white dog he sired had a black nose. The others were white with red patches and red noses and some with brindle patches and black noses. They probably are caused by different genes. red rednose and red black nose. I know it is possible for a dog to produce the red nose with the black nose like the brindle female who produced the seal dogs and then two reds. 1 red nose and 1 black. I'm assuming she had the genes for red coat color and then of course has the red nose gene also. He on the other hand I believe has the red nose gene which has the red coat connected because red nose dogs have red nose coats. I pup I have out of him is red rednose, gold-green eyes and red toe nails. IP: Logged |
goob Member Posts: 552 |
posted 12-18-2003 01:41 PM
I don't think there can be "true" whites in APBTs, only whites caused be white spotting. True white dogs, like GSDs, Westies, etc have pigmented skin, and only their fur is white. All the white APBTs I've ever seen have pink skin all over (maybe some pigmented spots, but the majority of the skin is pink), the skin is just like that under the white markings on colored dogs.
quote: What "color" (both base color and brindling color) brindle was the female? I'd guess that maybe she was probably a fawn/red dog (black nose) with black or brown brindling, which means that she would be able to throw a black nosed red dog. Then she was carrying the gene for the red nosed dogs, as was the sire, which accounts for the red nosed reds (don't know anything about the seals). The reason rednose dogs are always red is because the gene that modifies the pigment of their nose (from black to liver) does the same for the rest of their body, coat, skin, even eyes in most cases, which is why red nosed dogs often have light eyes. IP: Logged |
True_Pits Member Posts: 373 |
posted 12-19-2003 03:34 PM
She was black brindle. The base being black and the stripes were a dark brownish/almost gray color. That is where I think the seals came in. Because she was black brindle and he was a red and the pups were seal through intermediate dominance. I think if she had been a red or fawn (brindle) the pups would have come out to be reds and fawns instead of mostly seal. The bridle was actually a light fawn base coat with black stripes. The black nose male a fawn and the red nose female a light golden red. The sire is actually a really deep, dark red. Maybe I'll get pics of her (my light brindle) and the dam up in my album sometime. She is has black stripes over her light fawn coat which I haven't seen before. The pure white male he produced had pink skin and pink eye rims. I don't think I've even seen a pigmented one either. [This message has been edited by True_Pits (edited 12-19-2003).] IP: Logged |
goob Member Posts: 552 |
posted 12-19-2003 05:04 PM
Nevermind my last post then I doubt that her base color was black, if it was, the brindle wouldn't show. That's what happens in black and tan dogs that are also brindle... the brindling only shows on the tan points because the black masks it. She was/is? probably just a really heavily marked brindle, with a dark brownish base color.
quote: I saw one that looks like you've described at petsmart one day... the guy who had him (the dog) said he was because "his mom was a brindle and his daddy was a white, so when they mixed, it made the brindle lighter". Sad thing was is that this guy was planning on putting the dog (just a pup, at about 7-8 months old) up for stud soon. It was a pretty dog though, and I'd like to see pics of yours if you get them. IP: Logged |
True_Pits Member Posts: 373 |
posted 12-20-2003 08:02 PM
I don't think I described her right. I found a pic of her today I'll try to scan it soon. She wasn't black, but a dark brindle. The stripes were a like grayish-golden color. She has red eye rims u can see through her coat and red around her nose and muzzle you can also see through her coat. I like tha black and tans with the brindling. I've seen a few of thoughs. You know whats weird is how some of the seal dogs have seal brindling on their hind quarters and back legs. You can see it in the sun light. Just goes to show what type of idiots own these dogs or dogs in general. I can't believe the stupidity of some people. That is sad though and putting the poor dog up for stud. I found a few of her today and I'll scan those also. [This message has been edited by True_Pits (edited 12-20-2003).] IP: Logged |
True_Pits Member Posts: 373 |
posted 12-24-2003 02:37 PM
Hey Goob I have pics of her up now. http://www.picturetrail.com/gallery/view?p=999&gid=3059590&uid=1597348 She is the light brindle in the 1st 3 pictures. The first one she is with my red female that was taken this summer. I also added a couple of my other brindle female but they are a little further down and a couple more of the others IP: Logged |
ignergehl Member Posts: 174 |
posted 12-25-2003 08:16 PM
I know this has already been discussed ad-nauseum but I also have observed what you are saying about white dogs not really being white. I had a lovely white female named April a few years ago and although she was almost totally white, she had a tan spot on her rear and on one ear that had faint WHITE brindling throughout! Then the skin under her white coat was spotted, which I have decided is what bridlle shows as on white body parts. IP: Logged |
goob Member Posts: 552 |
posted 12-25-2003 10:41 PM
She's a pretty dog. Just a guess, but I'd say she's fawn w/ black brindling, and the brindle is just a bit "sparse" in coverage, which allows some of the fawn furs to peek through as well. Actually, in one of the pics, she looks almost blue fawn, but I don't know if that would be possible given her lineage? Igner, Haley has those skin spots too. She's mostly white, but has light fawn over her eyes and ears, and a spot on her butt/tail. From what I've heard, skin spots are pretty common on white dogs, but I don't know if any particular pattern or color causes them more often. IP: Logged |
ignergehl Member Posts: 174 |
posted 12-25-2003 10:49 PM
Iv'e looked at hundreds of pits over the years, and I have really noticed that brindle dogs would have spotted skin under their white markings, and that most white-with bridle dogs are spotted also, as if the spots are 'incomplete' stripes, or something. IP: Logged |
True_Pits Member Posts: 373 |
posted 12-26-2003 08:24 AM
Yeah she is fawn with black brindle. It is very sparse, hardly even complete lines. She is OFRN w/ some Colby and Eli/Carver/ also Tudor/Carver threw Plumbers/Hammonds blood. I think I can see where she may appear blue fawn in the pic where she is on the straw. IP: Logged |
True_Pits Member Posts: 373 |
posted 12-26-2003 08:26 AM
Ignergehl I've noticed too that brindle dogs sometimes have heavier spotting, but I don't think its brindle. Maybe just caused by the fact they are brindle? Especially the darker patched brindles seem to have them more. IP: Logged |
All times are ET (US) | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
Home | Contact us | Advertise here | Jobs at Auspet | |
© 1999-2017 AusPet.com |