|
Public Forum | Proceed to Auspet's New Discussion Forum | Pet Directory | Classifieds | Home | LinkXchange |
Click here to make Auspet.com your default home page |
Auspet - Message Boards
- Dogs - Pit bulls Offspring Size
|
UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
Author | Topic: Offspring Size |
True_Pits Member Posts: 373 |
posted 12-13-2003 06:24 PM
Well I decided to start my own thread on offspring sizes. Any insight would be nice, also if anyone wants to share their own experiences. And of course for something just to talk about. One of the most intereting this I find in dogs is genetics and how the make up of dogs can skip gens and different things like that. I find it a very interesting subject and things like this have always intrigued me. Freedon posted some on the Meka thread. I do agree it was partially right, but I've had experiences that were otherwise and know that the ancestery plays a role and not just the dogs themselves. The bitch I'm thinking of taking my 45-6lbs male to is about 36-7lbs. She is a real solid dog and has grown to be bigger than I thought she would but I'm sure that she has to be under 40lbs chain weight. As far as her top side they are just your average size dogs and I won't concentrate on that too much. Her bottom side is what I'll be looking at. The bitch's dam is a half sister to my dog's grand dams. They are all 3 out of a female who was 55lbs chain weight. Which is one of the reasons his sire is so big. the grand-dam is only 45lbs (grand-sire 40lbs) but my dogs sire is 50lbs when he isn’t so fat. On top of the bitch's dam being out of the 55lbs female she is out of a near 60lbs male. That is why I've been really pondering it. I don't mind if a few of them turn out to be 50lbs I guess, but I would rather have my dogs under 45lbs. I won't know if the ones I keep will be larger or average until they are older. It may not be the most important thing to think about when breeding but its something I've been considering and its a possibility. Especially since they are not just down from a 55lbs female its the same 55lbs female and in the bitch bred to a large male. That 55lbs female appears 3xs in my dogs 1st 3 gens. I don't mind having the bigger dogs, just hope no monster pop out. Its just a toss up. I'm currently doing a breeding with a 40+lbs female to a 50lbs CW male and I'm sure there will be some bigger ones in that litter but thats expected. There won't be any over 50lbs I wouldn't think and some probably won't be that big at all. The female is out of a 50 CW sire and 40 female. This male is the same one that produced the pups who are under a year but between 40-50lbs. Well hope that covers it, hope I didnt leave anything out. IP: Logged |
ignergehl Member Posts: 174 |
posted 12-13-2003 10:30 PM
My last litter, born in 1998, was sired by Thompsons Wedge, a 65 pound red brindle dog with Hammonds ancestry, and the bitch, April was 80 pounds, white with faint tan bridling on her ears. She was from a line that figured Clemmons Brendy, and Burtons Hank in her bloodline. So the crazy thing is, the smallest dog in the litter reached 80 pounds at 2 years of age, and the largest dog ended up weighing nearly 120!! Aprils first and only other litter was sired by a large (85 pound) male,but all of the pups were of relative size at maturity(60-70 pounds). Its very hard to say what will come of the union of two dogs with different bloodlines. Line-bred dogs will be more predictable in their size and type. IP: Logged |
True_Pits Member Posts: 373 |
posted 12-14-2003 02:31 PM
Do you think my prediction is close to accurate then? Of course there is no real way to tell. I didn't go into the bitch's top side earlier but her sire is a 1/2 brother to the dog my dog is bred off of. The 1/2 in my dog's ped is about 40lbs was bred to the 55 female, most the dogs were avarage size, but then when bred back to his 45lbs daughter off that litter produced 50-55lbs dogs. His sire was 38lbs and dam 34lbs. The 1/2 brother the bitch is off of is slightly bigger in appearence. They share the same 34lbs dam. This will be the bitch's first litter so it makes me wonder more. "The bitch's dam (40lbs) was bred to a dog that was about 45lbs, but has the looks of my male's sire and is his ½ bros actually (same dam, the one out of the 55lbs female). In that litter the offspring were between 40-60lbs!! Then when the bitch's dam was recently bred to a 50lbs CW male the pups are under a year and already in the 40-50lbs." The 1st breeding was linebred and the 2nd an outcross. Both types of breedings she produced big dogs. I forgot to mention before but she was bred to my dogs sire, which would be another linebreeding and she produced 55lbs dogs. She was also bred to his sire (my dogs grandsire) and had avaerage sized dogs in the 40s. The litter she produced with the bitch I'm looking at breeding is some of the smallest ones she produced with avarage sized dogs, between low 40s. 4 out of the 5 were linebred. IP: Logged |
Trick Member Posts: 22 |
posted 12-15-2003 05:16 AM
I haven't myself, bred any Pits, but...Trick's mother topped out at 37 lbs and his dad topped out at 38-9lbs. And Trick, well, he's one of those abnormally large pits. He weighs about 65-70lbs and is only 17 months. Funny how things work. He was bigger than both of them at 7 months IP: Logged |
benny boy Member Posts: 392 |
posted 12-15-2003 06:17 AM
i think its hard to tell, im not experienced in this, all i can speak for is my dog she's 7 mo. old and 33 lbs. her sire was 82 and the mom was 80 something. when i look at her now i can't see her getting to be that big, i hope she stays on the smaller side though, and lets say she does. if i bred her does that mean that she has the potential to throw bigger dogs? im guessing she does, but i don't really know genetics IP: Logged |
True_Pits Member Posts: 373 |
posted 12-15-2003 05:54 PM
I just got word that the bitch's sire had passed on. He is greatly missed and will never be forgotten. Thanks for everyone who has replied to my thread. Its strange the size ranges that this breed has. I think had the 55lbs female never been trown into the line as an outcross the dogs would have stayed in the 35-40lbs range. IP: Logged |
All times are ET (US) | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
Home | Contact us | Advertise here | Jobs at Auspet | |
© 1999-2017 AusPet.com |