Powered by Click2.com Dogs Cats Horses Birds Fish Other pets


Click here to make Auspet.com your default home page



  Auspet - Message Boards
  - Dogs - Pit bulls
  Pittbulls

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Posted by Topic subject:   Pittbulls
pete
unregistered
posted 04-22-2003 05:54 PM           Edit/Delete Message
I am going to try to x-press my point without sounding like a jerk. I live in the US. Banning dogs is still new but, I will fight till the end to prevent it. I don't understand how after all education one recieves in life you can still be closed minded enough to belive that you have the right to push the banning of pitts. And don't tell me that the comparison to banning races in society dosen't hold water. We are an evolving planet. Everyone should be entitled to freedom. The freedom to choose what kind of dog I want to own or a gun for that matter. The holocost is over.You cannot tell me that only pitts attack children. I am sure the dogs(all dog breeds)are at fault sometimes. I'm sure that a slap in the face by a child or provoking of any kind would bring on an attack also.Maybe people should supervise their children better around dogs until they are old enough to understand them. You can't prevent bad stuff from happening in life. Life isn't always fair. Extermination or caging up pittbulls won't fix anything If you want to go back to the stoneage do me a favor and crawl back into your cave and air your uneducated, nonethical, I have nothing better to do with my life than ruin someone eleses opinions there. Because no one has the right to take a life dog,cat,or human.

IP: Logged

shmoopie
Member

Posts: 361
From:Vancouver, BC
Registered: Jan 2003

posted 04-22-2003 06:16 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for shmoopie   Click Here to Email shmoopie     Edit/Delete Message
Hi Pete and welcome to the forum.

Attached is an article I located somewhere somehow...I have passed it along to the shelter where I volunteer and she loved the article..might help her to the right direction of getting the ban removed. Cheers and welcome!
http://news.mywebpal.com/news_to....ws&om=1
>
>Bad breed or bad rap? Pit bull ban in Prince George's being reconsidered
>
>
>04/10/03
>By Harold Goodridge
>Email this story to a friend
>
>Adrianne Lefkowitz, president of the Maryland Dog Federation, says Zu Zu and
>other pit bulls make affectionate pets. Staff photo by Laura Segall
>Rocky's last days were like those of 99 percent of the other pit bulls
>confiscated by the Prince George's County Animal Management Division.
>
>During his two days in captivity at the division's headquarters in
>Forestville, he was well fed with a mixture of dry dog food in his
>6-by-6-foot cage, walled in by cinder block on three sides and chain link
>fencing for the entrance.
>
>With about 40 similar cages at the division's headquarters in Forestville,
>Rocky was surrounded by up to 55 dogs, most of them other breeds.
>
>Some shared cages, but Rocky didn't.
>
>The tag attached to 6-year-old Rocky's cage read differently from the other
>dogs, who were up for adoption. The label on their cages had their name,
>breed or mix, and maybe a sentence on their disposition for potential
>owners.
>
>Rocky's label simply read, "This dog is not for adoption."
>
>On Feb. 22, Rocky, who had an encounter with two children two days before,
>was taken from his cage, muzzled and leashed and led paA pit bull sits
>"behind bars" at the Prince George's County Animal Management headquarters
>in Forestville. The facility euthanizes 1,000 pit bulls a year. Staff photo
>by Laura Segall.
>st the other barking dogs to a room where he received a fatal injection.
>
>Rocky's fate and that of another 1,000 pit bulls killed every year is
>largely the result of a cruel 1996 law that needs to be rescinded, according
>to the Maryland Dog Federation and county dog lovers.
>
>The ban went into effect in February 1997, and since then about 7,000 pit
>bulls have been put to sleep.
>
>Adrianne Lefkowitz, president of the Greenbelt-based Dog Federation, said
>the pit bull ban is unnecessary because the county already has laws to deal
>with nuisance and vicious animals. She said most of the pit bulls being
>killed by the county are good pets cared for by responsible owners.
>
>"Dogs are being destroyed not based on their behavior or because they're
>dangerous, but only because they are pit bulls," Lefkowitz said.
>
>Lefkowitz, who owns a 7-year-old pit bull named Zu Zu, is also a member of
>the Prince George's County Vicious Animal Task Force. The task force
>convened in October after the passage of County Resolution 68, which calls
>for a review of the effectiveness of the breed ban.
>
>Lefkowitz is a legal pit bull owner because she had registered her animal
>before the law went into effect.
>
>The Vicious Animal Task Force is made up of representatives of county animal
>rights groups, municipalities, and the county Police Department, Health
>Department, Animal Management Division and County Council.
>
>Lefkowitz said the task force is aiming to complete its meetings by the end
>of this month and present the County Council with its findings.
>
>After seven years of unsuccessfully lobbying against the breed ban,
>Lefkowitz said she is hoping the task force's findings will prompt the
>County Council to rescind the law this year.
>
>The findings include statistics from the Health Department that 743
>dog-biting incidents were reported in the county in 2002. About 64 of those
>involved dogs identified as pit bulls.
>
>"That's 679 bites happening in a year that are not by pit bulls, so you
>can't say they are the only problem," Lefkowitz said.
>
>Pat Sullivan, spokeswoman for the county Health Department, said the
>statistics also show that pit bull bites are down since the ban was passed.
>In 1996 there were 106, last year 64.
>
>"It's difficult to tell why pit bull bites are down," Sullivan said. "People
>could just be more cognizant of the law, or pit bull bites are down because
>of the law. It's hard to say."
>
>Lefkowitz admits that pit bulls' strong jaws make their bites more severe
>than those of most breeds, but a breed ban is not the answer, she said.
>
>"There is nothing that the pit bull law covers that is not already covered
>under the county's dangerous animal laws," Lefkowitz said. "The pit bull ban
>is an overlay law that traps caring, loving dog owners with dogs who never
>hurt anybody. That's not the exception. It's the rule."
>
>Rodney Taylor, chief of the Prince George's County Animal Management
>Division, agreed with Lefkowitz.
>
>"There are many occasions when we had to take someone's nice family dog
>away," Taylor said. "It's a hard thing to do. With the breed ban, we mostly
>get good pets from good pet owners."
>
>As for people who intentionally train or breed vicious pit bulls, Taylor
>said, "Those guys are hard to catch. They went underground" after the
>ordinance.
>
>As for Rocky, he was no angel. On Feb. 20, the 45-pound dog bolted out of an
>open front door at his Montpelier home and attacked two children, a
>5-year-old boy who received minor bites on both ears and his 8-year-old
>brother, who suffered a scratch to his left cheek, according to Prince
>George's County police.
>
>Anthony Hilliard, Rocky's owner, said his visiting mother-in-law was the
>only person at his home when the dog got out.
>
>"From what I understand the door was open and he ran out," Hilliard said.
>"He couldn't resist the fresh air."
>
>Hilliard said he was surprised when he heard that his "affectionate" family
>dog harmed children.
>
>"I'm sure Rocky just wanted to play with them," Hilliard said. "When the
>children saw him running out of the house, they ran away and, like any dog,
>he wanted to play chase.
>
>"Rocky never had problems with kids in the past," Hilliard said.
>
>"He wasn't a vicious dog. I have grandkids," he added, though he admitted,
>"My grandkids kept their distance from him and he didn't bother them. He
>didn't bother nobody."
>
>Linda Odom, who lives on Hilliard's street, witnessed Rocky's encounter with
>the children.
>
>"Good," Odom said after learning the dog had been put down. "My opinion on
>pit bulls is they have so much power, and I've heard so many horror stories.
>I'm glad they're outlawed in Prince George's County.
>
>The dog "wasn't that aggressive toward the adults, but he kept lunging for
>the kids," Odom said. She said a man who was with the children was able to
>get them away from Rocky.
>
>All legal pit bull owners in the county must re-register annually. While
>Rocky was registered before the law went into effect, his owner didn't
>re-register him in 1999, Taylor said, sealing the dog's fate.
>
>"It didn't look good for Rocky," Taylor said.
>
>If pit bulls were not banned, Rocky would have been dealt with under the law
>that governs the hundreds of other dogs that bite people every year.
>
>According to those laws, when an unprovoked dog bites or harms someone,
>police or animal control officers make a report and a hearing is scheduled
>before the county Animal Control Commission.
>
>At the hearing, the commission hears testimony from witnesses, victims, the
>dog owner and officers. If the commission deems the dog vicious and the
>owner incapable of controlling the dog, the dog is put to sleep. If the dog
>is deemed vicious but the owner is deemed capable of controlling the dog,
>the animal is entered into a vicious dog database and is allowed to remain
>with the owner, who is given strict guidelines on how to care for the dog.
>
>Prince George's County's "dangerous dog laws work and are some of the best
>in the country," Lefkowitz said.
>
>Lefkowitz said pit bull owners, like Hilliard, who have their dogs taken
>away call her organization for advice.
>
>"There's not much I can tell them because the way the law is written," she
>said, nearly in tears after learning about Hilliard's dog.
>
>Lefkowitz said some of the saddest calls she gets are from people who move
>into the county with a pit bull unaware of the law until they are confronted
>by police or animal control.
>
>"People call me in tears saying, 'I just moved here and animal control took
>my dog,' " Lefkowitz said. "That's some welcome wagon for people moving
>here."
>
>Victoria Cheek of Laurel was one of the few people who was able to save her
>dog before it was destroyed by the county. Cheek has a Jack Russell terrier
>and a dog she thought was a mutt until she returned home one day in February
>2002 to find a note on her front door from the Animal Management Division
>telling her that she was harboring an illegal pit bull.
>
>"She's a mutt," Cheek said of Lucy. "I didn't even know she was a pit bull."
>
>Cheek said her son found Lucy in 2001 in the parking lot of The Mall in
>Columbia, where he worked. "He heard the dog would be put to sleep if the
>county picked her up, so he brought her home."
>
>Cheek said one of her neighbors reported her to the county. "Someone made a
>complaint, being evil," Cheek said. "Lucy never had any encounters with
>anyone and is always on a leash.
>
>"This had nothing to do with how the dog behaves. It's just, 'I don't like
>the way you look. You look dangerous so we're going to kill you.' "
>
>The county told Cheek to bring Lucy to the Forestville headquarters. With
>official papers stating Lucy was a mixed-breed and had shots, and with
>letters from neighbors saying Lucy was friendly, Cheek met with the
>officers.
>
>"They said she had more characteristics of a pit bull and she needed to be
>euthanized," Cheek said. "She is the happiest dog. I can just imagine her
>tail wagging as they took her to the death room."
>
>After pleading to save her dog, Cheek said she was allowed to take Lucy on
>condition that she find a home for her outside the county.
>
>Cheek sent Lucy into exile on a friend's farm in Howard County.
>
>Cheek said dogs like Lucy and responsible dog owners like her family are
>victims of a bad law. "It's not about the dog, but how you train them and
>raise them," Cheek said. "If you're a lousy dog owner, shame on you. They
>shouldn't take it out on us good dog owners."
>
>Former County Council member Isaac Gourdine, who died last year, sponsored
>the pit bull ban after two Temple Hills children were attacked while playing
>in their back yard. Gourdine's original bill also included Rottweilers, but
>that breed was removed before the measure passed.
>
>Lawmakers in Baltimore and Washington, D.C., attempted to pass similar breed
>bans in the late 1990s, but failed. A proposed statewide pit bull ban also
>was rejected.
>
>Lefkowitz said she believes that type of law is being rejected elsewhere
>because people are more informed about pit bulls.
>
>"Some people call them Velcro dogs because they bond so well with their
>owners," Lefkowitz said. "They make great family dogs."

IP: Logged

All times are ET (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Auspet.com


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.45c