Auspet.com, resources for pet owners. Dogs, cats, fish & aquarium, horse, and birds questions & answars. Pet directory, message boards, vet advice & articles - Resources for Pet Owners World-Wide
   

Home | Classifieds | Articles | Pet Directory | LinkXchange | Advertise here
PawPapers Newsletter | Make Default Homepage | Bookmark

 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Quadriplegic wins against Gold Coast Council



 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Auspet.com Forum Index -> Dogs - Pit bull breeds specific
Author Message
tybrax
New member
New member


Joined: 06 Nov 2004
Posts: 5
Location: Queensland

PostPosted: Sat Nov 06, 2004 9:05 pm    Post subject: Quadriplegic wins against Gold Coast Council Reply with quote

Fonzie wins the day and his life
6Nov04

THE Gold Coast City Council's dangerous dog laws have been left wide open after a magistrate found major flaws in how breeds were identified.

Fonzie, the alleged pitbull terrier that has been on death row for four months, will be set free for a heart-warming reunion with owner Justin Taylor today, but the bigger picture should be of far more concern to the council.

Magistrate Jennifer Batts yesterday said she was not satisfied that the council's dog control officers had sufficient qualifications to determine the breed of suspected dangerous dogs.

Mr Taylor, a quadriplegic, went to court to win back his 'best mate' after Fonzie which Mr Taylor claims is actually a staffordshire terrier was picked up by animal control officers in July and identified as a pitbull, using a questionnaire-style criteria test.

The American pitbull is one of four types of dog banned on the Gold Coast.

Lawyers for Mr Taylor successfully argued the officers were hardly experts in identifying breeds of dogs and that the identification process itself was too open to interpretation.

The court was told the total training given to council officers in identifying dog breeds amounted to a one-day seminar, and a dog could be identified as 'dangerous' if it scored more than 70 per cent in a 16-point test.

That did not satisfy Ms Batts.

"She (council animal control officer Selina Neill) does not have either the experience, or the training, to qualify as an expert," said Ms Batts before quashing the destruction order.

Lawyers for Mr Taylor had brought along their own 'expert', a leading veterinary surgeon, but his testimony was noteven required.

Mr Taylor, who has relied on Fonzie's companionship since a surfing accident left him in a wheelchair five years ago, buried his head in his hands as the verdict was read out. He was overjoyed at the result.

"It's great. It's disappointing that we had to go through all this hassle to prove what I already knew, but I'm very happy," he said.

"I'm going to have my best mate by my side again. I will be there (to the pound) first thing in the morning to bring him home."

Acting for Mr Taylor, barrister Jack Pappas said the outcome showed there were serious problems with the council's protocol.

"The legislation is unworkable and it does not stand up under any sort of scrutiny," he said.

The decision could have far-reaching consequences for the council which has already put down more than 60 animals declared as dangerous dogs as yesterday's verdict opens the door for other dog owners to challenge the conclusion of animal control officers.

The council's director of community services, Colette McCool, said it was too early to speculate on any move to tighten procedures.


... catch up! Go Fonzie , l hope everyone that has lost there dog to this heinus crime Challenge the Councils all over QLD.

tybrax, tyra

What a wonderful day, fonzie has been returned. Surprised
Back to top
BXRchicProPit
Member
Member


Joined: 04 Nov 2004
Posts: 24
Location: Pittsburgh Area, PA

PostPosted: Sat Nov 06, 2004 9:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

That's awesome news!!!
Thanks for sharing that! Mr. Green
Back to top
kyles101
Super Senior Member
Super Senior Member


Joined: 18 Mar 2004
Posts: 1108
Location: Perth, Western Australia

PostPosted: Sun Nov 07, 2004 10:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

yes queenslands dog laws are ridiculous. anything that looks like a pit is able to be seized and put down if the owners cant find any sort of proof that it isnt a pit. many staffys have been put down for this reason. for the majority of people, who the heck has proof of what their dog is? crazy isnt it. just one of many reasons why id never live in queensland lol.
Back to top
BXRchicProPit
Member
Member


Joined: 04 Nov 2004
Posts: 24
Location: Pittsburgh Area, PA

PostPosted: Mon Nov 08, 2004 1:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

that's just rediculous! I'd be highly likely to ask if I could pet a pit bull if I saw one walking!!

on another forum that I'm a member of, a guy was saying that where he lives if you have anything that resembles a pit, it must be muzzled or it can be confiscated.
I'd rather have dogs unmuzzled and bad kids muzzled in the streets~
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Auspet.com Forum Index -> Dogs - Pit bull breeds specific All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1