| Author |
Message |
fishy_chick Member

Joined: 09 Apr 2004 Posts: 86
|
Posted: Sun Apr 25, 2004 6:11 pm Post subject: do I really need another filter? |
|
|
| I have a 67 gallon tank that I'm setting up as a reef aquarium. I used the tank for a year to house my Pacus and I used a Fluval 204 filter. I went to this store called Aquarium Illusions to get some supplies and the guy there told me that I need to either buy a Fluval 404, or get another 204. If this is necessary, I'll get another 204, but do I really need another one? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
t_h_e_s_a_c_k Member

Joined: 24 Mar 2004 Posts: 116 Location: Canada B.C.
|
Posted: Sun Apr 25, 2004 8:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| You do need more filtration than a single 204. The fluval 204 filters 40 us gallons maximum. If I were in your position I would get another 204 and have some extra filtration, even though you don't quite need that much. Another option would be getting a biowheel filter or something, like a emperor 280 or 400. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
t_chelle16 Moderator

Joined: 22 Mar 2004 Posts: 3436
|
Posted: Sun Apr 25, 2004 11:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The general rule for filtration is you need a turnover rate of 10x the volume of the tank with HOB filters or 3x - 5x with canisters or wet/dry filters.
So if you stick with canister filters like Fluval, you would need a total gph rating of 200 - 335 (more is better). Your curent Fluval 204 does 185 gph which is a bit low. Getting another one would put you at 370 which would be terific (it's a lot better to over filter than under filter).
-Chelle |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fishy_chick Member

Joined: 09 Apr 2004 Posts: 86
|
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2004 12:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I'll go out and get another 204 then. Thanks so much for your help! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fishy_chick Member

Joined: 09 Apr 2004 Posts: 86
|
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2004 1:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I just thought of something. If 2 of the 204s are more than enough for my tank, couldn't I just keep my 204 and buy a 104? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
t_chelle16 Moderator

Joined: 22 Mar 2004 Posts: 3436
|
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2004 4:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oops. I wasn't aware Fluval had anything smaller than 204.
A 204 & a 104 would give you 310 gph which is a 4.6x turnover, so yes, that would be fine.
-Chelle |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fishy_chick Member

Joined: 09 Apr 2004 Posts: 86
|
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2004 11:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Well you just saved me about 60 dollars, thanks so much! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|